Connect with us

International

US bets on new approach to anti-drug policies in Latin America

US bets on new approach to anti-drug policies in Latin America
Photo; AP

February 14th |

The Biden administration will redouble its domestic efforts and binational cooperation with Mexico to combat the fentanyl crisis in the United States, which has resulted in 70,000 overdose deaths annually.

In an interview with Voice of America, the director of the White House Office of Drug Control Policy, Rahul Gupta, indicated that the fentanyl crisis “does not begin or end at the border”, despite the fact that, according to official data, the vast majority of the synthetic opioid is produced by Mexican cartels and enters the country through the southern border.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reported seizing enough fentanyl in 2022 to potentially have killed the entire U.S. population.

Gupta acknowledged that “there is no question” that “mistakes have been made in the past,” referring to U.S. anti-drug policy and its cooperation with countries in the Western Hemisphere. His statement is an alternate response to the position of Colombian President Gustavo Petro, who has called the anti-drug policy of several U.S. administrations “a failure”.

Advertisement
20241211_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20240813_lechematerna_728x91
20240701_vacunacion_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
20230816_dgs_728x90
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
CEL
previous arrow
next arrow

Question: What are the next steps this administration will take on the fentanyl crisis?

Answer: It is a priority for President Biden. When he went to Mexico to talk to President Lopez Obrador, as well as Prime Minister Trudeau, this was one of the most important things he also talked about. It’s important that we make sure that we have educational campaigns, especially so that children are aware and understand that they have the power not only to be aware of this deadly threat, but also to have Naloxone, the antidote, so that they can help their friends and others. In addition, making sure that we have the treatment available to everyone who needs it – we know that too many Americans today cannot get the treatment – then, along with the antidote, getting more people treated.

In this administration, President Biden highlighted how we have reached the highest levels of fentanyl seizures at the border, double that in 2020 and four times that in 2019. Why? Because we have implemented technology to be able to detect more. But the problem doesn’t start or end at the border. We have to work with Mexico. We have to work with them because we have a shared responsibility for the safety, security and health for the people of both countries.

What exactly is Mexico’s role in this strategy?

Mexico has a very important role as our neighbor to the south, as well as a long-time partner. Our relationship is often complex, but we know that people in Mexico are dying from overdoses and fentanyl intoxication just as they are in the United States. So, it’s very important that we work with a shared sense of responsibility, make sure that we are working to protect our country, that we are going after the bad actors who are intent on harming Americans and Mexicans.

Advertisement
20241211_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20240813_lechematerna_728x91
20240701_vacunacion_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
20230816_dgs_728x90
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
CEL
previous arrow
next arrow

At the same time, we are working to improve public health treatment and the antidote Naloxone, or Narcan, and make it available to anyone who needs it.

When President Biden says the U.S. will hold producers and traffickers accountable here in the U.S., how much does the U.S. trust Mexico on this issue?

It’s very important. As you know, in this administration we have some of the highest numbers of extraditions. We have made sure that we provide assistance to Mexico, in partnership, as a key player in helping us, but we also want to make sure that traffickers, manufacturers and others are held accountable for their actions in taking advantage of vulnerable people. This is important because we want to make sure that they do not profit at the expense of unsuspecting people dying and being poisoned. So it is important, whether in the United States or across the border, that our governments hold bad actors accountable in a strong way.

How close or far do you think the United States is from reversing the trend of fentanyl overdose deaths?

If you look at it, we’ve had over 107,000 [deaths]. And, clearly, the numbers were rising before the pandemic and were exacerbated during the pandemic for obvious reasons, like social isolation, the initial shutdown of treatment and all of that. During the pandemic, especially with President Biden’s leadership, what we’ve seen is more telehealth, which means more health care assistance to provide treatment to people in rural areas, in underserved communities through telemedicine.

Advertisement
20241211_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20240813_lechematerna_728x91
20240701_vacunacion_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
20230816_dgs_728x90
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
CEL
previous arrow
next arrow

We also saw the removal of barriers. And we have also seen an increase in prescribing of antidotes and treatments. Because of some of these activities, combined with the seizure of more fentanyl and the prosecution of traffickers, we are seeing in five months in a row a decrease in the number of people dying from fentanyl overdoses. But let me tell you, that’s not enough, because, while we’re happy to see nearly 3,000 lives saved, we have a long way to go.

Does this White House believe that the war on drugs is a “failed campaign,” as the president of Colombia has called it?

Let me tell you this: when President Petro took office in Colombia early last year, I helped him and worked with him as the first U.S. delegation. We had a good long conversation about it, and I said, “look, we recognize that not all U.S. policies have proven to have been successful, but the important part is that we have a problem where an American dies every five minutes all day long. You have a problem where the economy is very dependent on cocaine production. We need to work productively in our 200-year relationship to see how we can secure a future for both the American people and the Colombian people in a way that complements each other.

And we need to see a way forward that is humane, that protects the environment. Because I flew over with Vice President Marquez and I saw the destruction of illegal mining in the Amazon, illegal crops, and it’s not helpful for Colombians, even because they are looking for a good life, good quality of life. So, it is very important for us when we think about this, to do it in a way that is productive and that is mutually beneficial for security and health.

But would you call the war on drugs a “failed campaign”?

Advertisement
20241211_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20240813_lechematerna_728x91
20240701_vacunacion_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
20230816_dgs_728x90
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
CEL
previous arrow
next arrow

The way I would put this would be: we didn’t even know a few decades ago that addiction was a brain disease. We didn’t know that it is not a disease of choice but a disease of the brain that affects the whole body. We also didn’t know, we now know, that incarcerating yourself doesn’t get you out of trouble. So what are we doing now? We are trying to work to bring treatment to every prison and jail in the United States.

So, what I would answer is very clear, mistakes have been made in the past, there’s no question about that. However, what we need going forward is to look at how we work with public health, public safety, collectively to solve this for Americans, solve this for other people and countries around the world, and the urgency demands that we do it, and we do it in a hurry.

And how do you frame this strategy on drug producers in Colombia and other countries in the Western Hemisphere? Because here in the United States, of course, there is a framework on the public health issue, but they are also trying to catch the bad actors in this. So how do you find that part of this strategy?

When you look at a single mother in Tumaco, Colombia, who is producing coca for her children as a way of life to survive, it’s not so much about crime as it is about livelihood. So, the way we look at this is that we have to make sure that these farmers have the ability to own their own land. Let’s make sure that they have the ability to grow crops that can be exported globally and that they can make a living. It’s very important that as President [Biden] talks a lot about jobs and the importance of jobs, infrastructure in the United States, it’s the same in a way for every country in the world that we have to figure out how to get people gainfully employed, give hope and the ability to have that economic development as a way to address that. And those are exactly some of the things that we’re going to be working with countries like Colombia.

What about the other countries in the Western Hemisphere? How is cooperation on this drug issue?

Advertisement
20241211_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20240813_lechematerna_728x91
20240701_vacunacion_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
20230816_dgs_728x90
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
CEL
previous arrow
next arrow

We know that trafficking and smuggling is a hundreds of billions of dollars business. We know that drugs not only kill Americans, but the profits come back to cause destabilization, more crime and corruption and violence [in those countries]. It’s very important to us as a world leader that we continue to work as good partners with other countries in Latin America. And there is a history of us working with them, but we make sure that we are doing it in a way that gives us results, mutual respect and cooperation so that we can put the weight of the law on the bad actors, while ensuring that people everywhere have the opportunity to live in a safe and healthy way.

And finally, what about Venezuela? There is no relationship or cooperation between the two governments, of course, but Venezuela remains a key player in this industry.

Well, we will continue to focus with our partners in Colombia, and also in Ecuador, to make sure that the people there get the support in terms of both the people coming from Venezuela and the resources. That work will continue, but I don’t have anything new to report on that at this point from a policy change perspective.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
20241211_mh_noexigencia_dui_300x250
20240813_lechematerna_300x200_1
20240813_lechematerna_300x200_2
20240701_vacunacion_300x250
20231124_etesal_300x250_1
20230816_dgs_300x250
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_300X250
MARN1

International

The AP agency sues the Trump Government after being banned for writing Gulf of Mexico

The American press agency Associated Press (AP) announced this Friday that it has sued three members of the Donald Trump Administration after being banned from the Oval Office and the presidential plane Air Force One for not complying with the directive of calling the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America.

“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not to be retaliated for it by the Government. The Constitution does not allow the Government to control freedom of expression,” the media maintains.

In its style guide, AP decided to continue calling the Gulf of Mexico “by its original name”, still mentioning the new name chosen by Trump, since it is a body of water that shares a border with Mexico and Cuba.

The White House formally blocked AP’s access to the Oval Office and Air Force One on February 14. “We are very proud of this country and we want it to be the Gulf of America,” Trump said on Tuesday.

The agency’s lawsuit, of 18 pages and filed before a federal court in Washington DC, alleges that they have decided to take this step to claim their right to editorial independence and prevent the Executive from coercing journalists to use only a language approved by it.

Trump signed the executive order to change the name to Gulf of America on January 20, the first day of his return to power. He later named February 9 as ‘ Gulf of America Day’.

The AP complaint is specifically directed against the president’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, his number two, Taylor Budowich, and the White House spokeswoman, Karoline Leavitt.

This Thursday, more than thirty US media asked the Government to restore AP’s participation in presidential events and not to take into account “the editorial point of view” when limiting access to the White House.

Among the signatories are the television networks Fox News and Newsmax, with a conservative tinge, in addition to other large newspapers such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, The Wall Street Journal or The Atlantic.

AP highlighted when reporting on his complaint that this Friday Trump referred to that agency as “radical left-wing lunatics”: It is “a third-rate company with a first name,” he said about it, the main one in the country and founded in 1846.

Continue Reading

International

Buenos Aires advances legislative elections to May 18 and suspends the primaries

The Legislature of the city of Buenos Aires approved this Friday the suspension of the open, simultaneous and mandatory primary elections (PASO), a measure that, according to the deputy head of government, Clara Muzzio, “allows to save 20 billion pesos (about 18,894 million dollars)”, and advanced the legislative elections for May 18.

“The City Legislature suspended the PASO, a measure that saves $20 billion for neighbors,” Muzzio announced on Friday.

For his part, the mayor of the City, Jorge Macri, maintained that the PASO “were an expensive mechanism that only solved the problems of politicians, not of the people.”

The May 18 elections, which were originally scheduled for July, will be held through the Single Electronic Ballot system.

In that instance, the inhabitants of the city of Buenos Aires will elect their local legislators and, in October, they will have to return to the polls to define, together with the rest of the country, the composition of the chambers of Deputies and Senators.

“The fact that the elections are in May allows each Buenos Aires to decide on their own city, without being tied to national discussions,” said the mayor.

The project was approved in the Buenos Aires legislature with 55 votes in favor, 3 against and one abstention, after an agreement between the main political forces.

The suspension of the primaries in the City of Buenos Aires occurs one day after the Argentine Parliament approved the same measure at the national level.

The original project sent by the national government sought the elimination of the primary system but finally, given the lack of support for that objective, the government chose to promote an initiative that suspends them for this year.

The primary election system was first implemented in Argentina to define the candidates for the 2011 general elections, based on a political reform approved by Parliament at the end of 2009, with the aim of democratizing political representation, transparency and electoral equity.

According to the PASO system, to be qualified to compete in the general elections, candidates or lists of candidates must achieve at least 1.5% of the total votes in the primaries.

All parties are obliged to participate in the primaries, although they do not necessarily have to present more than one list of candidates to decide which one will lead to the general elections, an option for which the majority of the forces have opted in the last elections.

That is one of the reasons why the system has been questioned, among which are also its costs and the cumbersomeness of the organization.

Continue Reading

International

Trump threatens to impose tariffs on governments that apply digital fees to US companies

The President of the United States, Donald Trump, signed an executive order on Friday that threatens to impose tariffs on foreign governments that apply digital fees to US companies, including Spain, the United Kingdom and France.

The order states that “foreign governments have exercised a growing extraterritorial authority over US companies, particularly in the technology sector,” and directly cites the taxes on digital services that “several business partners” apply since 2019.

According to the text, the Trump Administration will impose tariffs on those governments that use taxes or regulations that are “discriminatory, disproportionate or designed to transfer significant funds or intellectual property from US companies to that government or its chosen domestic entities.”

Trump delegates to the US Trade Representative the possibility of “renewing investigations” on the so-called technology fees of Spain, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Austria and Turkey, imposed in the first term of the Republican, and if so, “take all appropriate actions”, which would include the imposition of tariffs.

“US companies will no longer sustain failed foreign economies through fines and extortionational taxes,” says the White House document, which provides for a “process” for them to “report” these “disproportionate” measures to the Commercial Representative.

He also instructs him to investigate together with the Secretaries of the Treasury and Commerce whether in the European Union or the United Kingdom the use of products or services of US companies is “required or encouraged” to “undermine freedom of expression”, political activity or, “otherwise, moderate content”.

It also suggests to the Representative, among other things, to hold “a panel” with its partners of the T-MEC (Canada and Mexico) on the tax on digital services in Canada, and identify ways to achieve a “permanent moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions”.

The order does not mention any specific company, but mainly affects large technology companies such as Apple, Google (subsidiary of Alphabet), Meta and Amazon, which have precisely starred in a resounded approach to President Trump since he won the elections in November.

In his first term (2017-2021), Trump ordered to investigate the digital fees to his companies abroad and threatened to apply tariffs to the six countries indicated today; taxes were imposed in the government of his successor, the Democrat Joe Biden, and subsequently suspended.

Trump signed another executive order aimed at restricting access to US technology, especially in the field of artificial intelligence, what he calls “foreign adversaries”, including Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Russia and China.

The executive order does not specify in detail what measures will be taken to restrict the access of these “foreign adversaries” to US technology.

Under the label of “foreign adversaries”, the order identifies China, Hong Kong, Macau, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia and the “regime of Venezuelan politician Nicolás Maduro”, according to the text.

Trump justifies his decision with the argument that “economic security is national security” and maintains that the country must protect its sensitive infrastructures and technologies, from artificial intelligence to semiconductors and advances in biotechnology.

The executive order focuses especially on China, pointing out that companies linked to Beijing have used investments in the US to access key technologies and that the Chinese government is taking advantage of US technology to modernize its military apparatus.

Since his return to the White House on January 20, Trump has announced several restrictions on trade with the aim of balancing the trade balance and pressuring countries such as Mexico and Canada to make concessions on immigration and efforts against drug trafficking.

It has imposed a 10% tariff on China, which is in addition to the rates already applied during its first term (2017-2021).

Trump’s new restrictions come after his predecessor, Joe Biden, took steps to limit exports of semiconductors and artificial intelligence technology to China, which led Beijing to respond with export controls on graphite, a key material for electric vehicle batteries.

Continue Reading

Trending

Central News